Beyond Monoliths: Unveiling the Microservices Revolution

Beyond Monoliths: Unveiling the Microservices Revolution

In the intricate dance of bits and bytes within the digital ecosystem, evolution reigns supreme. Charles Darwin’s principles of adaptation and survival, unveiled in the biological realm, find parallel significance in the domain of software development. Amidst the ongoing battle between traditional technologies and modern trends, victory consistently aligns with approaches offering more while demanding less. This is particularly evident in the clash between monolithic and microservice architectures.

Check out these big numbers revealed by the industry giants after switching their functionalities to a microservices architecture:

  • 250 Million Hours: Daily video streaming by Netflix to over 139 million subscribers.
  • 500 and Beyond: The number of microservices powering Uber’s agile business model.
  • Diverse Ecosystem: Amazon’s microservices enabled a tech giant’s evolution beyond e-commerce.

The Rise and Fall of Monoliths

Monolithic architectures once dominated the tech landscape, presenting an all-encompassing approach to software development. Developers could contribute to a singular, expansive space, executing their work seamlessly. However, as with any evolution, the benefits of monolithic structures eventually transformed into burdens. Picture it as a Jenga game – remove one piece, and the entire structure collapses. Managing monolithic applications became a headache, especially when faced with surges in users and resources.

In 2007, as online streaming gained popularity, a pioneering company emerged, challenging the norms of monolithic structures. Faced with the daunting task of stabilizing their system amidst a rapid audience surge, this company made a strategic decision. Instead of persisting with the overloaded monolithic approach, they opted for a groundbreaking shift to microservices. This decision marked the beginning of a success saga now globally recognized – Netflix, Inc.

Netflix: Shifting from Monoliths to Microservices

Netflix, with 139 million subscribers globally, confronted the limitations of a monolithic architecture in 2008. As Netflix faced massive data corruption due to a technical error on their side, significant downtime occurred. To make sure no mistakes happen in the future, they switched to an AWS cloud-based microservices architecture. The main reason for the enterprise to undergo this digital transformation was to enhance availability, scalability, and speed.

The migration involved breaking the application into over 700 microservices, each handling a specific functionality. This enabled Netflix to make changes without risking the entire system’s stability. The move to AWS allowed rapid scaling of services, addressing the challenges of expanding subscribers, video watch hours, and global support for various devices.

Moreover, the switch to microservices enabled Netflix to develop, test, and deploy services independently, fostering a more agile development environment. At present, this OTT giant handles around 250 million hours of video streaming time with a growing subscription count of more than 139 million. Their services are scaled over 190 countries in total, showcasing the success of their timely migration to a microservices architecture.

Uber: Transitioning from Monoliths to Microservices

As a startup, Uber initially operated as a monolithic app, catering to the needs of a single city – San Francisco. However, as the platform expanded to multiple cities and introduced new services, maintaining the monolithic system became challenging. Deploying changes meant updating the entire codebase simultaneously, hampering continuous integration and making it difficult for developers to manage dependencies.

To address these challenges, Uber transitioned to a microservices architecture, breaking the monolith into smaller, independent services. This allowed components to be written in different languages, use distinct frameworks, and have separate databases. The move to a service-oriented architecture (SOA) presented challenges in terms of obviousness, safety, and resilience.

Uber overcame these challenges by implementing Apache Thrift, a binary communication protocol, to manage over 500 services efficiently. Thrift simplified service management, addressed security concerns, and ensured resilience through the development of latency and fault tolerance libraries.

Microservices not only resolved development challenges but also provided Uber with the flexibility to expand its business offerings. With over 500 services, Uber improved its agility, continuous delivery, and overall business growth, showcasing the effectiveness of transitioning from monoliths to microservices.

Amazon: Evolving from a Monolithic E-commerce Platform

In its early years, Amazon operated on a monolithic e-commerce platform, handling various functions from inventory management to customer orders. However, as Amazon diversified into cloud computing, streaming services, and digital content, the limitations of the monolithic architecture became apparent.

To address these challenges, Amazon adopted a microservices architecture, breaking down applications into smaller, modular services. DevOps practices facilitated continuous integration and delivery, enabling independent development and updates for each microservice. Leveraging AWS, Amazon achieved independent scalability, cost efficiency, and dynamic resource allocation.

Technical innovations, such as containerization with Docker, played a crucial role. Containerization allowed the packaging of microservices and their dependencies, ensuring consistency across different environments. Orchestration tools like Kubernetes automate container management, enhancing scalability and reliability.

Amazon’s transition to microservices resulted in improved system reliability, faster development cycles, and scalability. This shift allowed Amazon to evolve into a tech giant with a diverse range of services beyond e-commerce, contributing to its success in the dynamic tech landscape.

Turning Roadblocks into Success Stories 

Let us now break down the specific challenges Netflix, Uber, and Amazon faced while using a monolithic structure and how they overcame them with microservices:

Challenge #1: Scalability

As the user base grew rapidly, the monolithic architecture struggled to scale efficiently.

Solution: These organizations embraced a microservices architecture with a cloud-native approach. They utilized cloud services, particularly Amazon Web Services (AWS), to dynamically scale individual microservices based on demand. Each microservice was independently deployable and scalable, allowing Netflix to allocate resources efficiently where they were needed most.

Challenge #2: Isolating Faults

In a monolithic structure, a failure in one module could potentially bring down the entire system.

Solution: Netflix, Uber, and Amazon implemented fault-tolerant design patterns within their microservices. They employed concepts like circuit breakers, which prevent the failure of one microservice from cascading through the entire system. Circuit breakers detect and handle faults, isolating the impacted microservice while maintaining the overall stability of the application.

Challenge #3: Agile Development and Deployment

Monolithic applications often face challenges in rapid development and deployment due to their size and complexity.

Solution: Microservices facilitate agile development practices. The companies could release updates and new features more frequently because changes to one microservice didn’t require changes to the entire system. This agility allowed them to stay ahead in the competitive streaming market.

Challenge #4: Technological Diversity

Monolithic architectures often limit technology choices, as all components must use the same tech stack.

Solution: Microservices enabled the organizations to use a polyglot approach to technology. Each microservice could be developed using the most suitable programming language and technology stack for its specific requirements. This flexibility allowed the companies to leverage the strengths of different technologies across their ecosystem.

Challenge #5: Resource Efficiency

Monolithic applications might consume more resources than necessary, leading to inefficiencies.

Solution: The development team implemented containerization and orchestration using technologies like Docker and Kubernetes. Containerization allowed each microservice to run in isolated environments, ensuring resource efficiency and minimizing dependencies. Kubernetes provided orchestration capabilities, automating the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized microservices.

Challenge #6: Development team anatomy

Monolithic applications may require a centralized development approach, limiting the autonomy of individual development teams.

Solution: Netflix, Uber, and Amazon adopted a decentralized approach to development and operations. They organized their development teams around specific business capabilities, each responsible for one or more microservices. Teams had end-to-end ownership, from development to deployment

 and operations. Strong API contracts between microservices enabled teams to work independently without interfering with others, facilitating this autonomy.

Today, almost every business is a software business, and the competition is pretty fierce. In such a scenario, custom web application development offers a significant competitive advantage. Customization allows you to work with features that make your solution or service distinct from others in the same industry. Even if you’re offering a solution that is exactly the same as others, a custom web app development company can work with your team to create a unique user experience for your customers, giving them more reasons to stay with you. This is particularly beneficial if you’re a small or medium-sized business that has to rely heavily on customer satisfaction and loyalty to compete against the larger players in the market.

Prerequisites for Microservices: Assessing Organizational Suitability and Challenges

Microservices encapsulate various dependent services, each assigned specific tasks to execute applications. These applications leverage APIs to establish communication, facilitating the seamless flow of data. These microservices offer advanced features, enhancing development flexibility and ease.

With microservices, you have the liberty to employ any programming language for constructing each function. Moreover, updating a specific service unit within the system becomes a straightforward task, eliminating concerns about impacting the rest of the application.

While the advantages are enticing, organizations should carefully evaluate the following factors before transitioning to microservices:

  • Organizational Culture: Companies with rigid hierarchies or isolated departments may struggle to adapt to the collaborative and autonomous nature of microservices teams.
  • Technical Capabilities: Organizations need to have expertise in these practices such as continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), containerization, and automated testing. 
  • Existing Infrastructure: Organizations with legacy systems or tightly coupled architectures may encounter difficulties in decoupling components and establishing clear service boundaries.

Apart from these, there are other factors to consider such as resource allocation, data management, operational complexity, etc. And at the end of the day, we have to accept that not all organizations are suited for microservices architecture. Factors such as organizational size, project scope, and industry regulations may influence the feasibility of adopting microservices. It’s crucial for organizations to assess their unique context and constraints before committing to a microservices journey.

A Seamless Transfer to Microservices

The success of Netflix illustrates the potential benefits of embracing microservices. However, a thorough understanding of organizational needs and a commitment to overcoming the difficulties that come with this architectural change should be the driving forces behind any transition.

As organizations embark on this transformative journey, careful consideration of technical, cultural, and operational aspects will pave the way for a seamless transition. At Expeed Software, we specialize in guiding businesses through seamless transitions to microservices and further management. Our expertise ensures a thorough understanding of your unique requirements, and our commitment extends to providing solutions that enhance scalability, agility, and resilience.

Join hands with Expeed Software to unlock the full potential of microservices, positioning your organization for sustained success in the dynamic digital landscape.